Go to page 1
| Forum » Suggestions » similar transfers | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
what do you think?
|
||
|
Username
3059 msgs.
Best scorer
|
similar positions should appears in the result such as LF for an RF(we ve got to be complete the following combos in addition to the LF/RF, LW/RW, LB/RB, LM/RM, LIM/RIM and LDF/RDF) this will allow us to get a better look at the value of the player as more results will be taken into accounts Edited by Fahorax 18-07-2013 05:04 Edited by Fahorax 18-07-2013 05:05 |
18/07/2013 05:03 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1184 msgs.
International
|
Yeah I agree with this, it would also be nice to see the ages of either side of the player | 18/07/2013 13:59 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
686 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
fantastic idea, +1000 would also help a lot more if you could do it in searches aswell | 18/07/2013 14:21 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
4668 msgs.
Best scorer
|
CF XX/20 : CF XX/19 - CF XX/21 = good! CF XX/XX : LF XX/XX - RW XX/XX = bad! |
18/07/2013 18:29 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3059 msgs.
Best scorer
|
@rishu5 said: CF XX/20 : CF XX/19 - CF XX/21 = good! CF XX/XX : LF XX/XX - RW XX/XX = bad! we agree you cant compare CF with LF and RW, we were talking of LF with RF and LW with RW... |
19/07/2013 00:03 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
121 msgs.
Substitute
|
+1 Great Idea |
19/07/2013 13:21 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
612 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
+1 happy to see a good suggestion on forum. | 19/07/2013 13:41 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3880 msgs.
Best scorer
|
yeah i agree, great suggestion | 19/07/2013 19:26 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Fiscal
1835 msgs.
International
|
I am all for expanding the range of similar transfers because it makes it easier for players to come up with numbers and simpler for fiscals to determine fairness. I would love to see the prices of players a year older/younger and +/-5 points added to these lists. That being said, I don't think having different positions show up is worthwhile, even if they correspond to each other. Just because an LF/RF mirror each other on the pitch, does not mean they mirror each other economically. Often times one side is in much lower supply and thus, more expensive. I see justifying the price of the opposite side player based on this as problematic. |
20/07/2013 05:44 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
Go to page 1
1
