Go to page 1
| Forum » Suggestions » Junior Team Development | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Should Youth Development be Addressed and Made More Important, Transparent and Equal?
|
||
|
Username
1 msgs.
Ball boy
|
I believe every manager should be required to field a full, functional youth team instead of owning only a single position group of youth players and training them every day until they reach the market at age 18 already having realized almost their entire potential so that they start to lose average points in their early to mid 20s. I think the fact that the youth team games aren't given a visible simulation and youth team results don't seem to matter at all to a team's health, growth or success contributes largely to the youth team abuse by managers in this game. It's why the player market is inflated and assures that managers in lower divisions are forced into these tactics to generate enough revenue to buy the quality of players they need to compete and advance in the game. Another way to alleviate this is to change how the training system works. When in real life does only one position group benefit from a day of training? It's weird that a training like sprints, for example, only benefits certain players and some far more than others. If each player benefitted from training each day as happens in real life, there would be no system of over training players to benefit from and exploit. Does this make sense at all, or am I the only one on here who thinks this should change? Edited by missingwordsinlimbo 11-08-2021 09:12 Edited by missingwordsinlimbo 11-08-2021 09:14 |
11/08/2021 09:11 |
| Wichita Wings - Div3/Gr6 | ||
Go to page 1
1
